Should you be Creating a Donor Engagement Score?

by | Oct 1, 2019 | Learning Edge Blog, News

Gayla Scrivener
Steve Grimes
via LinkedIn

When wealth screenings first came along in the late 1990’s, early 2000’s, it was wizardry! Suddenly we could evaluate and segment thousands of records amazingly fast. Sure, we have to verify the top-rated with manual research to be sure the matches are correct and evaluate the whole file for known trouble spots, but even so, it was a giant leap for fundraising.

The next promising leap forward is the way machine learning can continuously digest growing data to identify patterns that suggest things like engagement, affinity, gratitude, or other synonyms that express nuances in how a donor prospect feels about our organization.

As Steve points out, when we can pair the ability to make a gift with how engaged a prospect is with our organization we can introduce a whole new level of efficiency to major gift portfolio management as well as inform decision-making on fundraising strategies that will meet goals.

But for the vast majority of nonprofit organizations don’t have enough resources to implement these new and expensive solution sand the return on investment isn’t high enough to justify the purchase.

If you want your organization to benefit from an engagement score, but you are nervous about analytics or you don’t know how to get started, Steve has some great tips for you.

Tune in as Steve answers the questions: Why is an engagement score important? Should every organization create one? Can you create an engagement score even if you don’t “do” statistics?

Additional Resources

Book: Statistics for Dummies
Podcast: Apra Podcast Series
Course: Foundations in Fundraising Analytics Course | Designed especially for people who are nervous about analytics, breaking each skill down step-by-step with tips to navigating large data sets in Excel.
Workbook: Foundations in Fundraising Analytics Workbook | Designed as a complement to the course, this workbook is a valuable reference.

Words from happy Researchers

Success Stories

I love your Master Class format – small group, clearly defined curriculum, solid professional information and resources and focus on discussion.  But most importantly I was impressed and delighted to see that you incorporated an additional and extremely practical layer of knowledge, through hands on experience with tools (pivot tables) or resources (Candid).  This adds real value to the educational experience you offer.

Betsy Mehlman

2020-Master Class

Jen’s course on insider stock and compensation was informative, interesting, and well-thought out. Jen broke down the complicated material into digestible pieces. She showed us resources that I use in my day-to-day research that I wouldn’t have otherwise known about. Jen is always quick to respond and has been helpful even after the class has ended. She answers questions thoroughly and is always pleasant.

I was able to take what I learned from the course and present the material to our front-line fundraisers. One fundraiser told me after my presentation that she discovered one of her donor’s compensation was much higher than she thought. So, already, this information has come in handy! Thanks again Jen!

Kim Anthony, San Francisco CA

Insider Stock and Compensation

The Capacity Rating Workshop was really useful. I was new to the prospect research field when I took the workshop, so it helped to demystify capacity ratings for me. The online classroom provided a great forum for interaction with the other participants and for a robust exchange of ideas. Beyond that though, Jen shared a wealth of information and resources about capacity ratings and other important aspects of prospect research. I highly recommend this workshop whether you’re new to the field or have years of experience in our profession.

David Lloyd, Prospect Research Professional, San Francisco, CA

Capacity Rating Workshop

Articles that inspire

Learning Edge